Monday, July 27, 2009

Weak Monsoon Rains Threaten India's Economic Rebound

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124867275575083055.html

NEW DELHI -- An unusually dry start to India's monsoon season is threatening to hurt agricultural output in an economy still hugely dependent on rural areas for growth.
[Parched paddy field ] AFP/Getty Images



This file picture taken on May 14, 2009 shows an Indian farmer and his son walking over their parched paddy field on the outskirts of Agartala. (Parthajit Datta/AFP/Getty Images)

A below normal crop yield may weigh on a nascent economic recovery and push up food prices, straining the government's budget further and complicating the central bank's efforts to revive the economy without letting inflation get out of hand.

After the driest June in 83 years, four of India's 28 provinces have declared drought. More than half of Uttar Pradesh state, India's most populous state and a key rice- and sugar cane-growing area, is drought hit. Rainfall between June 1 and July 22 was 19% below normal, with the northern and northwestern regions worst hit.

The Meteorological Department forecasts rainfall in the June-September wet season at 93% of the long-term average, which is not an unusually large deviation. But the distribution so far has been extremely uneven, with some areas flooded while others have been parched.

The June-September monsoon is critical for summer-sown crops, including oilseeds, rice, and sugarcane, as 60% of fields are rain fed. If rainfall remains sporadic through September, winter crop yields, such as wheat, could also be hurt, analysts said.

This is a challenge to a country where two thirds of the 1.1 billion population live in villages and agriculture accounts for around 18% of gross domestic product. Rural demand accounts for more than half of domestic consumption so any hit to farmers' incomes would hurt demand for everything from fuel and motorcycles to soap and gold, with knock-on effects on the broader economy.

The government is alert to the risks but hasn't sounded the alarm yet. That may reflect confidence that various measures it's taken to spur economic growth in rural areas will help offset some of the shock from a weak crop.

"It's premature to draw any doomsday conclusion and it's better to wait to check if rains revive," said Arvind Virmani, chief economic adviser to the federal Finance Ministry.

But economists are starting to pencil in downside risks to their forecasts for the economy, which has remained one of the most resilient in Asia to the global credit crisis thanks to its relatively small dependence on exports.

Robust rural demand has helped cushion the blow from the global downturn, with India's economic expansion outpacing those of all its regional peers except China. Growth slowed to 6.7% in the year ended March 31 from 9% a year earlier. The government forecasts an expansion between 6.25% and 7.75% for the current year but a poor harvest could cast that projection into doubt.

"If overall rainfall deficiency falls to 20%-25%, India's gross domestic product growth could be pared to sub-5% this fiscal year," said Mridul Saggar, chief economist at Kotak Securities.

It's not clear if the dry weather so far portends more of the same. Heavy rains last Tuesday lashed the northern province of Punjab, among India's top five rice producing provinces, ending its dry spell. Last year's monsoon revived later in the season, helping farm sector output grow 1.6%.

The government forecast a 4% expansion in farm production when it unveiled its budget last month, but Morgan Stanley said low rainfall could limit growth to between 1.5% and 2%.

A slump in the agricultural sector would put pressure on the government to respond with support measures, even as it already struggles with a fiscal deficit that is estimated to swell to a record 6.8% of GDP this fiscal year.

"The government can't look away from the problem and despite the tight fiscal situation, it will try to incentivize farmers, which may swell its subsidy bill," said Shubhada Rao, Chief Economist at Yes Bank.

A bigger hazard could be higher inflation.

The wholesale price index - the main gauge of inflation - fell 1.17% in the week to July 11 from a year earlier, a sixth straight week of declines. But economists say inflation will likely reappear in September, as elevated food prices remain sticky and a recent fuel price hike ripples through the economy.

The Reserve Bank of India expects inflation at 4% by the end of this fiscal year on March 31. Jahangir Aziz, chief India economist at JP Morgan Chase, said inflation could rise by two-to-three percentage points over that baseline forecast if the monsoon rains don't pick up.

India doesn't have a large stock of oilseeds and may have to resort to imports which may cost up to 0.4% of GDP, he said.

Scarce rains have forced some farmers to switch from rice to other crops, such as coarse cereals that can survive with less water. India's summer-sown rice acreage fell about 21% between June 1-July 17 to 11.5 million hectares from a year earlier.

Farm Minister Sharad Pawar Friday told Parliament he has banned exports of wheat and non-premium rice for over a year because of the poor monsoon.

The government may also raise procurement prices for some summer sown crops such as rice by 500 rupees ($10.4) per metric ton to encourage more sowing, a senior farm ministry official said.

Prices of sugar and tea have risen 30%, pulses 17%, and cereals 12% from year ago levels, said Citigroup's Rohini Malkani adding that the government may be able to head off a serious spike in food prices, given high stocks of rice and wheat from previous bumper crops and adequate foreign exchange reserves for imports.

Thursday, July 2, 2009

The project

Brief objective and justification: Objective of the study is to examine self-efficacy of agricultural farmers or farmers engaged in agricultural activities. Findings will help to develop new knowledge about psychological counselling to agricultural farmers in distress with interface of agriculture. Currently, Indian farmers expressed low self-efficacy and are deprived of psychological counselling system due to lack of systematic knowledge in this area.

Introduction
Self-efficacy refers to the confidence in one’s ability to behave in such a way as to produce a desirable outcome (Bandura, 1977). Farmer’s judgements of his capabilities to organize and execute courses of action required to attain designated types of agricultural performance is called farmer self efficacy. Low self-efficacy is positively related to anxiety and depression. Sometimes, it leads to committing suicide. Currently, many farmers are committing suicide (Gyanmudra, 2007) suggesting development of low self-efficacy within them. High self-efficacy allows one to deal better with uncertainty, distress and conflict and to set more challenging task objectives. In distress, those with high self-efficacy recover more quickly and maintain commitment to their goals (Schwarzer, 1992). It is assumed that farmers with high self-efficacy will improvise or innovate or adopt new technology in farming. Recent study has noted that farmers with high self-efficacy motivate towards cultivation of multiple crops (Dutta Roy, 2008). Self-efficacy is developed through cognitive and social learning processes (Bandura, 1986, 1993). Social learning is a higher form of learning occurring in a social context for the purpose of personal and social adaptation (Goldstein, 1984). In agriculture field, social learning is facilitated through social persuasion by training, enactive mastery experience and vicarious experience. High self-efficacious farmers often use the above process in different ways. The exact pattern of self-efficacy and the social learning process of agriculture farmers in the current changing scenario is not known due to lack of any systematic study in this area. Proposed project will reveal new knowledge about pattern of self-efficacy and its social learning process. This can be used for training, psychological counselling and guidance to farmers with agriculture interface.

Methodology:
Multi stage stratified random sampling will be followed in sample selection. Data will be collected from 960 farmers (20 farmers X 6 districts X 2 blocks (high and low producing), X 2 crops (paddy and non-paddy) X 2 adoption group (more amount of high yielding and less amount of high yielding technology).

Measures :
(a) Farmers self-efficacy questionnaire : A questionnaire will be developed to assess 5 dimensions of self-efficacy – farming self-efficacy, farming self-concept, self-regulation, value of farming, mastering task goal.
(b) Social learning questionnaire : Questionnaire will be developed to study (a) enactive mastery experience (setting task goals, the criteria for evaluation, task difficulty, (b) vicarious experience (social modelling), and (c) social persuasion.
(c) Interview schedule : One interview schedule will be developed to assess (a) socio-economic status, (b) land conditions (land holding, land utilization, irrigated, land salinity, fertility), (c) adoption of technology (amount of high yielding technology adoption), (d) specific difficulties in technology adoption and (e) availability of physical and social infrastructure support system during crisis.
(d) GHQ: Goldberg’s General health questionnaire will be administered to the farmers to assess their mental health and to validate farmer’s self-efficacy questionnaire.

Statistical Analysis : Relevant multivariate statistics will be used to (a) determine main and interaction effect of districts, blocks, technology adoption, crop pattern on self-efficacy pattern of farmers and mental health ; and (b) to explore correlates of farmers self-efficacy.

Research plan
2009-10 : Initially, for development of self efficacy questionnaire, data will be collected from 300 farmers (150 HY adopters and 150 HY non-adopters) using 4 questionnaires. Item analysis, reliability and validity of the instruments will be determined.

2010-2011: In this session, district and block wise sampling will be made. And respective local investigators will be selected. Data will be collected from 480 farmers (20 farmers X 3 districts X 2 blocks (high and low producing), X 2 crops (paddy and non-paddy) X 2 adoption groups (more amount of high yielding and less amount of high yielding technology).

2011-2012 : Final set of data collection will be completed following above sampling procedure and report will be submitted.



Project Beneficiaries :
· Department of Agriculture, Govt. of West Bengal;
· Researchers concerned with psychology in Agriculture;
References:
a) Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychol. Rev., 84, 191-215.
b) Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A Social cognitive theory, Englewood cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall.
c) Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psycvhologist, 28, 117-148.
d) Dutta Roy,D. (2008). Self-efficacy of agricultural farmers; Proceedings of the 12th International and 43rd National conference of Indian Academy of Applied Psychology (IAAP), p.
e) Goldstein, H. (1922). Social learning and change. NY: Tavistock Publications.
f) Gyanmudra, (2007). Farmers suicide in India. New Delhi: Deep & Deep publications Pvt. Ltd.
g) Schwarzer, R. (2001). Social-cognitive factors in changing Health-related behaviours. Current directions in Psychological Science. 10,2, 47-51.

About Me

My photo
The True Meaning of Life "We are visitors on this planet. We are here for ninety or one hundred years at the very most. During that period, We must try to do something good, something useful, with our lives. If you contribute to other people's happiness, you will find the true goal, the true meaning of life." H.H. the 14th Dalai Lama